Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About Lee Cary
Since 2007, Lee Cary has written hundreds of articles for several conservative websites including the American Thinker, Andrew Breitbart’s Big Journalism and Big Government (as “Archy” Cary in 2010), for TeaParty911.com in 2013, for the Canada Free Press and American Spectator, as well as for New Media Journal. Cary’s work has been quoted on national television (by Sean Hannity) and on nationally syndicated radio (by Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin). His work is cited in Jerome Corsi’s book "The Obama Nation" and in Mark Levin’s "Liberty & Tyranny". Along with Levin, Cary wrote an introduction to Sharron Angle’s book "Right Angle". http://www.TEAParty911.com
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Benny Goodman & The GOP’s Support for Amnesty
Lee Cary
February 7, 2014
Conservative talk show hosts and literary pundits have been speculating as to why the GOP House leadership supports amnesty.

Benny Goodman found the formula for a cogent explanation decades ago – keep it simple.

You may not remember Goodman. "The King of Swing," played the clarinet – as good as it's ever been played. The "Patriarch of the Clarinet" also led a great swing band in the mid 1930s.

"The Professor" was a simple, humble man. The ninth of twelve children born (in 1909) in Chicago to Jewish immigrants David Goodman from Poland, and Dora Grisinsky from Lithuania.

David Goodman, who worked in the Chicago Stockyards shoveling lard, signed his son up for music lessons when Benny was 10.

Year later, when his music was heralded around the world, a reporter asked him, "Why do people like your music so much, Benny?"

Benny blinked fast a couple of times, looked down, and said, "Well, I guess because it's good." And there it was - the simple truth. Actually, it was better than "good."

Today, the question is "Why do House GOP leaders push amnesty?"

Pundits wonder what's behind Boehner and the boys' support for amnesty for millions – no one knows how many – of illegal immigrants.

Columnist Ann Coulter recently put the GOP on suicide watch in a piece entitled "GOP Crafts Plan to Wreck the Country, Lose Voters."

Rush Limbaugh cited one blogger's theory that the GOP is pushing amnesty so that when they win the midterm elections they don't win so big that it'll boost the TEA Party movement.

Another popular hypothesis asserts that the GOP blue-bloods adhere to a statist political philosophy akin to that of the Democrat Party. The heavy elephants are merely Democrats-lite.

Then there's the theory that leading GOP House members – like Paul Ryan – are looking past their current employment toward a time, relatively soon for some, when their salary balloons from about two hundred thousand a year to a lobbyist's two million, and more, as they cash in on their bipartisan, consensus-building, non-extremist creds on K Street.

Now, all of a sudden, Boehner announces that "immigration legislation" can't advance because President Obama can't be trusted to enforce the law. Really? Has John been in a comma for the last five years?

In 1986, Benny Goodman's clarinet went silent for good. So we can't ask him why he thinks Boehner and the boys start playing the amnesty tune that, if completed, would damage their party's future.

But that question is based on a questionable assumption. Namely, that amnesty is not in Boehner and the boys' perceived self-interests. That assumption may not match their musical score.

Here's a Benny Goodman-like answer to the question: "Well, I guess they just want to please their big-donor base."

In music, it's all about notes. In politics, it's all about money.

There's no law that says opposing organizations – like the RNC and the DNC – must refrain from embracing the same outcome based on varying self-interests.

For example: Democrats fear out-spoken conservative Republican Senators backed by the TEA Party movement. And, "moderate" Republican Senators clearly feel the same way.

Both camps see Senators Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Michael Lee as political opponents, because, in politics, the enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.

Big Republican donors want a huge new pool of cheap labor because, without it, re-industrializing America will be prohibitively costly.

Democrat progressive socialists want a huge new pool of loyal voters because, without them, their welfare state agenda can't be sustained.

It's just a simple tune in 4-4 time.

Or, as Benny might say, "Well, I guess because they both want to gain something for themselves from amnesty."

Where's that leave the country?








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server