Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld
Dr. Ehrenfeld is the Director of the New York-based American Center for Democracy and the Economic Warfare Institute. She is the author of hunderds of articles, academic publications and three books: "Funding Evil: How Terrorism Is Financed," "Evil Money," and "Narcoterrorism." Along with ACD fellows, Dr. Ehrenfeld is at work on a new book, "The Muslim Brotherhood, Inc." Dr. Ehrenfeld is an authority on economic warfare, terrorist financing, the shadowy movement of funds through international banking and money laudering. She has a unique understanding of the challenges of international terrorism to democracy and freedom, and how manipulations of financial markets, Islamic banking, transnational criminal groups, money laundering and political corruption facilitate terror financing and economic terrorism. An American citizen fluent in several languages, Ehrenfeld has testified before Congressional Committees, as well as the Canadian and European Parliaments, and provided evidence to the British Parliament, and consulted government agencies such as the Department of Defense and Homeland Security. She organized numerous international conferences and with the ACD team served as an election observer in Central Asia, North Africa and Eatsern European countries. She is also a Member of the Board of Directors of the Committee on the Present Danger along with former Secretary of State George Schulz and former CIA Director James Woolsey. She has been a visiting scholar at the Columbia University Institute of War and Peace Studies, a research scholar at the New York University School of Law, and a fellow at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and Jesus College at Cambridge University. She has a Ph.D in Criminology from the Hebrew University School of Law. Her articles have appeared in numerous publications such as The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Newsweek, Guardian, Los Angeles Times, The WAshington Times, Huffington Post, and The Jerusalem Post and she is a frequent guest on The O'Reilly Factor, and CNN, NBC, CNBC, FoxNews, FoxBusiness, and other national and international TV and radio programs. http://www.acdemocracy.org
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Deceiving the Nation
Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld
February 3, 2014
President Obama's remarks on his foreign policy achievements in his State of the Union address on January 28, 2014, were misleading. A good example is his boasting, "American diplomacy, backed by the threat of force, is why Syria's chemical weapons are being eliminated."

Why then, did US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel asked his Russian counterpart, Defense Minister Sergei Shogun, to "do what he could to influence the Syrian government to comply," just a day after the president assured us that his policy is working?

On the following day, US representative to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Robert Mikulak warned that "the effort to remove chemical agent and key precursor chemicals from Syria has seriously languished and stalled". And in what amounts to admission of failed US policy, on February 1, in Munich, "Secretary Kerry pressed Foreign Minister Lavrov to push the regime for more progress on moving the remaining chemical weapons within Syria to the port in Latakia."

The information about Assad's delay in surrendering his chemical weapons was available before Obama addressed the nation. Was he ill-informed? If not, did he try to mislead Americans into believing that the world is safe from Syria's chemical and biological weapons?

Unlike his boss, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, in testimony before the Senate Select Intelligence Committee, said that Assad "may now have the ability to produce biological weapons on a limited scale." Moreover, Clapper warned "that some elements of Syria's biological warfare program might have advanced beyond the research and development stage and might be capable of limited agent production, based on the duration of its longstanding program."

On Syria's Islamist terrorism, Obama said that "While we've put al-Qaida's core leadership on a path to defeat, the threat has evolved as al-Qaida affiliates and other extremists take root in different parts of the world. In Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Mali, we have to keep working with partners to disrupt and disable these networks. In Syria, we'll support the opposition that rejects the agenda of terrorist networks."

Clapper, however, did not echo the president or repeat the line about al-Qaeda's core leaders, but described the training of foreign rebel fighters by al-Nusra and other al-Qaeda groups in Syria "to go back to their countries" and commit terrorist acts. He further described this as "one of the newest threats emerging in the past year to US security." Clapper elaborated that "core al-Qaeda" chief Ayman al-Zawahri has empowered various nodes of his organization to choose their own terrorist targets, mostly local, although he encourages them to focus on the United States when they can.

Clapper's estimates of the percentage of Syrian rebels affiliated with al-Qaeda was low compared to most reports, as was his estimate of the number of foreign jihadis among the rebels, although even those numbers he clearly regarded as a significant threat to the US He, unlike the president, also noted that sub-Saharan Africa has become a hothouse for "extremists" and that Yemen's AQAP was capable now of carrying out attacks against the US

So much for having al-Qaeda on the run, President Obama.

However, the President had quite a lot to say about Iran, but most of it had to do with repeating the importance of the diplomatic approach. Again, the president claimed that his diplomacy works because it is backed by force. He even went so far as to say that "As commander in chief, I have used force when needed to protect the American people, and I will never hesitate to do so as long as I hold this office...We must fight the battles -- (applause) -- that need to be fought, not those that terrorists prefer from us -- large-scale deployments that drain our strength." He then gave credence to jihadis' claims that their violence is merely a response to US aggression, saying that deployment of American force "may ultimately feed extremism." Not surprisingly, Obama stresses the withdrawal of projected American power as key to his foreign policy approach.

Obama also claimed that the US had already reversed the trend toward an Iranian bomb. Yet, the only thing that has been reversed is the US policy towards Iran. Iranian leaders have repeatedly contradicted his claim, before and after his State of Union address.

Before meeting Kerry in Munich, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif told Reuters, "Iran was not prepared to give up research on centrifuges used to purify uranium as part of a final nuclear deal." This despite the agreement Iran signed with the P5+1 on January 20 in Geneva, that it would "limit certain aspects of its nuclear activities, including a voluntary suspension of its 20-percent uranium enrichment program."

Nonetheless, since Obama ignores the facts on the ground, Iran was rewarded on February 1, with the first installment of six of its unfrozen funds, $500 million "in accordance with the agreement."

This article was originally published at the American Center for Democracy. Refer to original article for related links and important documentation.








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server