Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






De Blasio talks tough toward banks and big business, but he's planning to crack the whip on Mom and Pop. Private charity and charter schools will also be brought to heel in de Blasio's New York.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
De Blasio's 'March' to End
Inequality Tramples the Little Guy

Timothy P. Carney, The American Enterprise Institute
As New York City's crusading liberal Mayor Bill de Blasio takes up his pitch fork, don't worry too much about the wealthy bankers he plans to tax -- they can fend for themselves. The potential victims of de Blasio's "march toward a fairer, more just, more progressive place" are the small businesses and voluntary associations that make up civil society.

Charter schools, crisis pregnancy centers, small businesses and private charities are all in de Blasio's crosshairs. These are government's rivals in the business of getting people what they want and need -- and a growing government doesn't tolerate rivals.

Charter schools have long irked the teachers' unions and many others on the Left. They are publicly funded schools, but they are run by private bodies. This decentralizes power, weakens the unions and applies competitive pressure to public schools.

But charter schools' worst offense may be offering a different educational experience. The Left puts a huge emphasis on solidarity, which is a virtue. But sometimes "solidarity" can mutate into uniformity. If some New York City kids are at a stellar charter school while others are at mediocre public schools, then we have, to use de Blasio's favorite phrase, "two cities." This is intolerable to many activists and journalists on the Left, some of whom pen out op-eds declaring it a sin to send your kids to private school.

De Blasio is taking aim at the charters. His first step: charging them rent for using city buildings. Again, these are basically public schools, just ones given more leeway in forming curriculum and hiring staff. Charging them rent is really just fining them -- for the offense of being partially independent from government.

Crisis pregnancy centers are clinics for pregnant women, run by pro-life charities. They provide counseling, some basic health services and things like free baby clothes and toys. These centers also refer pregnant women to adoption services and advanced healthcare.

But these centers don't perform abortions or refer women to abortionists, and they counsel against abortion. De Blasio attacks them as "sham crisis pregnancy centers" and promises to sic regulators on them. If you want to help pregnant women in de Blasio's New York City, you have to do it according to de Blasio's values -- which means more abortions.

De Blasio talks tough toward banks and big business, but he's planning to crack the whip on Mom and Pop. Currently, small businesses are exempt from the city's requirement that employers provide paid sick leave. De Blasio promises to end that exemption and saddle small businesses with that burden.

Private charity will also be brought to heel in de Blasio's New York. Nonprofit conservancies, funded by private donations, bankroll most of the operation of New York's Central Park. De Blasio wants to grab a huge portion of this money and redistribute it around the city. In effect, he wants to tax donors on their donations and use their money for his own purposes.

New York City government trying to shackle private charity is nothing new -- former Mayor Michael Bloomberg famously cracked down on good Samaritans feeding the homeless. But de Blasio poses a greater threat than even Bloomberg.

De Blasio's inauguration set a tone of intolerance for dissent. One speaker painted de Blasio's win as victory in the Civil War and promised "a new Reconstruction era." If you deal with your vanquished foes in city politics as if they were slaveholding traitors who started a war, that's worrisome.*

A century and a half ago, Reconstruction involved disenfranchising the losers and subjecting them to military rule. What would de Blasio's Reconstruction entail?

The mayor has little respect for those he disagrees with. "I know that our progressive vision isn't universally shared," de Blasio said at his inauguration, typically a moment for unity. "Some on the far Right continue to preach the virtue of trickle-down economics." Gotta love those open-minded liberals!

De Blasio plans to use government's power to crack down on civil society. He regards his ideological opponents with disdain.

This attitude makes even his modest liberal plans worrisome. Universal preschool is a standard liberal dream. But if some four-year-olds are under the care of benevolent city government, and others get individual attention from a stay-at-home moms, isn't that also a "Tale of Two Cities"? Universal K-12 education is compulsory. How long can universal Pre-K remain optional?

If de Blasio really intends to "put an end to economic and social inequalities that threaten to unravel the city," it will involve more than redistributing wealth. It will require coercion and rule by fiat, which are antithetical to America's democratic values.

We can admire de Blasio's ideals as he promises a "march toward a fairer, more just, more progressive place." But from every indication so far, it will it be a forced march.

Timothy P. Carney, the Washington Examiner's senior political columnist. His column appears Sunday and Wednesday. Refer to original article for related links and important documentation.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 01/05/2014








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server