Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

Archive Email Author

About Nina Easton
Nina Eastin is an award-winning author, columnist, and TV commentator. For six years she has been a regular panelist on FOX News Sunday and Special Report, and has appeared on NBC's Meet the Press, CBS's Face the Nation, and PBS's Washington Week in Review and Charlie Rose. Ms. Easton is the author of the critically acclaimed "Gang of Five: Leaders at the Center of the Conservative Ascendancy." Prior to joining Fortune as a senior editor, she won a number of national awards as a Los Angeles Times writer, and later served as the Boston Globe's deputy bureau chief in Washington. She is a graduate of the University of California at Berkeley.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
5 Reasons Why Obamacare Is
Still a Problem for 2014 Democrats

Nina Easton
December 28, 2013
The 2014 mid-term elections are looming, and swing-state Democrats are nervous. Meanwhile, the White House is scrambling to minimize its Obamacare-inflicted hardships on Americans through a growing list of exemptions and delays. Will it be enough to keep the Senate in Democrat hands?

"Hardship" was precisely the word Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius invoked late last week in assuring six Democrat senators that -- no -- she wouldn't punish those 6 million Americans who have lost their insurance because of Obamacare. The tax penalty won't apply if they go without insurance or buy stripped-down catastrophic plans.

This was the latest in a string of moves to ease the pain of reengineering one-sixth of the nation's economy. With the calamitous website rollout, deadlines have been eased and insurance companies "strongly" encouraged to accept late payments. And months before became fodder for comedians and commentators alike, the White House had granted a one-year delay in the employer mandate -- after business leaders offered up their own hardship claims.

Here's why the White House's desperate attempts to stem the political bleed may not be enough to hold onto the Senate:

Democrat control of the Senate hinges on the fate of seven Senate seats in states that rejected President Obama in favor of Mitt Romney in 2012. Ads that highlight Obama's broken promises, repeated often by the Democrats -- "if you like your insurance you can keep it; if you like your doctor you can keep him" -- will prove powerful motivators against Democrat senators seeking to hold onto their seats.

While Democrat senators will be weighed down by the President's Obamacare-driven low approval ratings and growing credibility gap, there's another powerful political factor at work: People vote on things that directly affect their lives. Fear and anxiety over economic security -- and health -- is a much bigger motivator than, say, government deficits. So when millions of Americans start losing their health insurance or are being forced to pay higher premiums, a nervousness seeps into the body politic that is difficult to reverse.

Democrats can't change the conversation to GOP "extremism." The Pierre wing of the Republican Party failed to mount a repeat of its September-October political death march, when a government shutdown left the GOP with historically low approval ratings. This time the staunchly conservative -- but politically astute -- Paul Ryan, chair of the House Budget Committee, crafted a budget compromise with liberal Senate Democrat and budget chair Patty Murray. The deal passed, and the government stayed open. The result? At least right now, there is nothing to blur the narrative about traumas wrought by the President's massive healthcare reform.

Even with a boost in enrollment figures, serious trouble threatens the Obamacare horizon. There is the real prospect that when open enrollment comes around next summer, employers will start canceling employee health insurance -- preferring to pay the penalty rather than cover the cost of plans with Obamacare-required standards. And the greatest danger to Obamacare itself is the imbalance in enrollees. An older, sicker population is signing up. Younger, healthier customers -- who make the economics viable -- have stayed away, turned off by website problems as well as concerns about the security of their personal information. Will the White House be forced into a taxpayer-subsidy of insurance companies to keep the whole thing afloat? Will premium costs rise to keep the whole thing afloat? Talk about political dynamite.

Attempts by White House allies to boost the enrollment figures among a younger, healthier population don't do much to give confidence to Democrats in swing states whose political futures are tied to the success (or failure) of the President's healthcare law. The "Pajama Boy" tweet -- featuring a twenty-something in a "onesie" next to text reading "Wear pajamas. Drink hot chocolate. Talk about getting health insurance" -- went viral -- but not because it was an effective outreach to uninsured adults. It drew a mass audience, including Obama allies, that was mocking its silliness.

And that wasn't the only ham-handed attempt to boost enrollment. This week the Log Cabin Republicans denounced as offensive a lascivious ad targeting the gay community that featured men prancing around with each other in their underwear.

To truly appreciate the uneasiness among Senate Democrats, it pays to listen to West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, among the most outspoken Democrats calling for a delay in the healthcare law. Manchin worried out loud on CNN's State of the Union last Sunday that the whole healthcare law could be headed for a "complete meltdown" if "it's so much more expensive than what we anticipated, and if the coverage is not as good as what we've had."

And the political victims? His Democrat colleagues up for re-election -- and Obama's control of the US Senate.

The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server