Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






When GM entered bankruptcy, the creditors should have taken their losses, and the company could have been reorganized at no cost to taxpayers.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Bailouts Leave a Legacy of Cronyism
The Cato Institute
This month's sale by the Treasury of its remaining shares in General Motors should offer us all an opportunity to say "never again."

Pay no attention to the the Obama and Bush administration cheerleaders. The federal rescue of GM, along with the TARP in general, serves as an example of everything wrong with Washington.

The TARP was little more than a transfer of losses from inept corporations to the taxpayer, mistaking the redistribution of losses with their avoidance.

Let's start with the easy part: The taxpayer is projected to take a loss of more than $20 billion on two of the TARP programs. About half of that loss is from the $50 billion GM bailout; the remainder is largely the result of various failed housing assistance programs.

It didn't have to be this way. When GM entered bankruptcy, the creditors should have taken their losses, and the company could have been reorganized at no cost to taxpayers. The same is true of the banks. A conversion of debt to equity would have recapitalized the banks at no cost to the taxpayer. Any upside would have been shared with the creditors.

We were repeatedly told, however, that the only choices were bailout or liquidate. GM, among others, proved that a false choice. Just as many of us have flown on bankrupt airlines, banks and automakers could have been operated in a reorganization.

Let's also not forget that there was no authority under the TARP to assist automakers. Congress had voted down an auto bailout. But the Bush administration blatantly ignored the law and provided assistance, punting the issue to President Obama. If that weren't bad enough, Obama bullied creditors and rearranged chains of priority to reward allies. Equality under the law took a beating.

As a Senate staffer in 2008, I took part in the efforts to oppose TARP. Its promoters promised untold profits and an economic turnaround. The TARP law itself sets out a number of objectives, such as promoting jobs, preserving homeownership and home values, along with protecting the taxpayer.

Five years later, it's impossible to objectively conclude that any of these stated purposes of the TARP were actually achieved. The current recovery is one of the weakest on record, and the very measures TARP promised to revive are all far below peak. Its legacy, however, is a different story: one of cronyism and lawlessness.

Mark Calabria is director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute. Refer to original article for related links and important documentation.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 12/23/2013








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server