Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
No Moral Grounds for Obamacare
Jason Sagall
December 16, 2013
In the wake of the fiasco of the federal health exchange website, its crooked "navigators," millions losing their insurance and the scandalous "if you like your plan, you can keep it," we can expect President Obama to go to his moral defense of the Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare) more zealously than he ever has.

So he goes, platitude by platitude: The healthcare law may not be perfect, but sometimes the good of the ends justifies an imperfect means; we each have a personal responsibility to do our part to make things work for the greater good of our country; if the healthcare law gets people the insurance they need, then it's simply the right thing to do.

As bromidic as it is, well-meaning people buy into that argument. Which is unfortunate, because the argument is not well-meaning. It serves to destroy every person's natural and constitutional right to be left free.

The defenders of that right are dubbed the "'I've got mine' crowd" by entitlement seekers who use moral intimidation to promote an invented "right" to healthcare. But the entitlement seekers don't care about rights, they care about wealth redistribution -- call them the "we'll get yours" crowd. And politicians love them, because they help promote big government.

In essence, the moral defense of Obamacare is nothing but an empty guilt trip with bad intent, as critical examination will reveal.

When someone says that the ends justify the means, he is admitting that he will allow himself to forgo justifying the means in order to satisfy his desire for the ends. "The ends justify the means" amounts to: "my ends justify themselves." That is, he is evading the responsibility of the moral judgment of his actions.

When someone asserts a "greater" good (or public/common/collective good), he is admitting that he will allow himself to rationalize an immoral act -- the act that tramples the "lesser" good -- in order to achieve his desired ends. "For the greater good" amounts to: "despite my immoral means."

That is, he is evading his own judgment of the immorality of his actions.

Anyone concerned with the "right thing to do" must, first and foremost, refrain from initiating force against others. He must not view ends in isolation, severed from means, or try to weigh means and ends against each other. Means must be evaluated against a proper fundamental standard that governs human action. And means thereby judged immoral invalidate the ends.

Obamacare, like all redistributionist programs, turns morality on its head by holding need as the moral standard. This subjects anyone to the force and whim of a thousand masters, or a hundred thousand, or as many who declare such need.

That is the antithesis of a moral system.

Continue reading this article...

The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server