Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About Robert McReynolds
Robert McReynolds is an analyst and correspondent for NewMediaJournal.us. He works as a government contractor at Ft. Belvoir, VA as an intelligence analyst. I spent five years in the Navy and was stationed at NSA and on board the USS Bulkeley (DDG-84). I am currently completing a Masters degree in International Relations at the Catholic University of America.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Extremism or Pluralism?
Robert McReynolds
December 9, 2013
The German magazine Der Spiegel had an interview today with Alain Finkielkraut, a French essayist and the son of a Jewish Pole. The interview was about the French denial or loss of itself as a civilization and Mr. Finkielkraut's lamentation about the self-inflicted circumstances which France finds itself. Among the specifics given for France's loss of self are weakness in the political class to state to the public that there is something worth applauding about French culture, no incentive for immigrants to assimilate into French culture, and the rise of right-wing political groups in France, namely the National Front.

Mr. Finkielkraut described the National Front in his interview by saying that it would not be in the favorable position it is currently in "if it had not discarded the old issues of the extreme right." Apparently, judging from his following sentence, the National Front used to advocate a religiously dominated monarchy. "Nowadays the National Front focuses on secularism and the republic." But that was not the most insulting thing he said about the National Front's "right-wing extremism." "This party appeals to people's base instincts and hatred. And these are easy to kindle among its supporters." You see, the National Front is only seeking power for power's sake and they are accomplishing this through rousing the hatreds of their less cerebral constituents.

In Europe, movements that are considered the "extreme right" have been making gains in elections because of people's fears over economic longevity, an immigrant population that appears to not want to assimilate, and a consolidation of political power in Brussels among a political elite. The three issues tend to be very intertwined. As the stagnating European economy gets worse, more and more immigrants come into European Union member states and inevitably find their way onto the public dole. Meanwhile many economic policies that greatly affect France are made not in Paris nor by French politicians, but by the European Union and the Members of the European Parliament.

Pointing these deficiencies out to the European Unionists garners a very condescending reaction. Thomas Guenole of the French university of Political Science told CNBC's Alice Tidey in October that the National Front's economic policies demonstrate "complete ignorance" and would lead to "economic and financial catastrophe." Despite the blatant insults to those who share the same fears as the common man, the solutions implemented by the Unionists seems to only compound problems, or, at the very least, continue the stagnation.

The TEA Party faction in the United States faces the same type of ridicule from the American Left. It would be a great feat for one to find a mainstream publication or political pundit on the cable networks who was not conservative (and even that might be a stretch) to discuss the concerns of TEA Party affiliated politicians with merit. Instead, the very President of the United States runs around denigrating their political stance by using a sexual innuendo to slight them, "TEA Baggers."

The concerns here in the United States are very similar to the ones that have birthed a very populist movement on the Right in Europe. There is immense debt, an immigrant population that is at the very least more inclined to vote 75 percent of the time for the party of the welfare state, and an economy that shows no signs of producing any real careers that are not in some way tied to the government sector. But if you are some one who is concerned about this, then you are just "ignorant" and worthy of the moniker "TEA Bagger."

To exacerbate problems, the events that seem to be driving the harmful outcomes are given credit when things look good, but the policies that actually are causing the little good that can be detected are said to be causing the problems. This past week it was announced with much fanfare that the job numbers for November were very promising. But what was not mentioned, unless you are a listener to Rush Limbaugh or a reader of CNSNews you would not have known that 41 percent of those jobs were in the government sector, and that is not even getting into the remaining 59 percent to see how much of that was made up of seasonal employees due to the Holiday shopping season. A month ago when the October numbers came out and looked very drab, the two and a half week partial government shutdown was to blame. It could not have been the effects felt by employers of the actual implementation of Obamacare.

At some point these types of policies are going to do great damage to the United States and to Europe across the pond. If these problems are not honestly addressed, then the idea of a strong West to compete with a rising Rest will be a laughing matter, unless you are rooting for the West. Mr. Finkielkraut ended his interview with Der Spiegel by saying that he has become "sad and feel a growing sense of anxiety...I wish the politicians were able to speak the truth and look reality in the face." But every time the do it seems some one of Mr. Finkielkraut's caliber rushes to call them "ignorant" "TEA Baggers."








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server