Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






By forming an alliance with Michigan, Illinois was able to bypass a drawn-out, expensive bidding process because the state procurement code says HFS doesn't need one if there is an intergovernmental agreement. Client Network Services Incorporated already has a contract in Michigan.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Illinois Officials Under Fire for Obamacare Contracts
FOX News
Making Obamacare a reality will require massive computing power to track, store and process the millions of individual cases.

But in Illinois, contracts to compute that state's cases – valued as high as $190 million – are being awarded without competitive bidding.

The practice already has watchdogs crying foul.

"No transparency and with no bidding -- if that's legal in Illinois, It shouldn't be." said Adam Andrzejewski of OpenTheBooks.com, a watchdog group.

"To the extent that is happening across the country, the citizens need to know it."

"It has the hallmarks of everything that is Chicago and also Illinois, which is totally imprudent and not the best practices," says Illinois Republican State Senator Ron Sandack.

Illinois cases are stored and processed in the Medicaid Management Information System or MMIS. The Department of Health and Family Services describes the 30-year-old system as antiquated and needing an upgrade to handle the massive case load expected from Obamacare.

A company from Gaithersburg, Maryland, Client Network Services Incorporated or CNSI, already has a contract in Michigan to perform similar services.

By forming an alliance with Michigan, Illinois was able to bypass a drawn-out, expensive bidding process because the state procurement code says HFS doesn't need one if there is an intergovernmental agreement.

"The system can be built in much less time," wrote Illinois director of HFS, Julie Hamos. "Which is saving taxpayers millions of dollars versus Illinois implementing a much costlier stand-alone system."

CNSI, however, has encountered problems in other states.

The company sued Louisiana after a contract there was terminated during an investigation into whether CNSI and a handful of other companies violated ethical guidelines during the procurement process.

According to OpenTheBooks.com there were also cost overruns in Washington and Maine and a lawsuit in South Dakota that ended in mediation.

However, the federal government certified CNSI, which was sufficient for Illinois to move forward with the intergovernmental agreement.

"The issues in other states since then do not in any way reflect the technological capabilities and performance Michigan has experienced with CNSI," wrote director Hamos.

A spokesperson for CNSI said these kinds of partnerships will be part of the future and computing for the Affordable Care Act will be handled in "a cloud" -- meaning cases will be filed in one state, then computed, stored and processed in a mega-computer somewhere else.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 08/30/2013

Editor's Note: And because the Progressive corruption emanates from Chicago and its surrounding suburbs -- and because this area is the dominant voter demographic in the State -- the people who do not believe in "the Chicago way" are saddled with the scar of this corruption...And when the State Attorney General is the daughter of the House Speaker? As they say in Cicero, "fugettaboutit!"








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server