with the Muslim Brotherhood
Roger L. Simon
August 23, 2013
It's hard to fathom how or why our administration ever thought the Muslim Brotherhood saw democracy as other than a means to an end -- and a particularly repellent one at that -- in the first place.
It's not as if the MB is subtle. They have proclaimed who they are since their founding by Hasan al Banna in 1928 and have not wavered in any significant way since in their global jihadist goals. They have also been unstinting in their massive misogyny, homophobia and rigid support of Shariah law über alles (quite literally über alles, since the Brotherhood were -- virtually the last still unrepentant -- allies of Hitler in WWII).
You know, liberal stuff.
Democracy, as their kissing cousin Turkey's Erdogan so blithely explained, is "like a streetcar. When you come to your stop, you get off." Or, as one of the Brotherhood's own internal documents put it in that oh-so-distant year of 2007, they (the MB) are dedicated to "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house."
That's from the Muslim Brotherhood's "General Strategic Goal" for North America. The "miserable house" of Western civilization of course includes all the tenets of classical liberalism and most of those laterally paid lip service by today's soi-disant "liberals" (rights of women, rights of homosexuals, freedom of expression, ad tedium, ad hypocrisia).
And yet those same liberals -- not to mention the increasingly addle-brained John McCain who seemingly can't tell an al-Qaeda operative from Paul Revere -- are suddenly pounding Saharan sand in outrage at the extreme treatment of the Brotherhood at the hands of the mean Egyptian military.
Give me the proverbial break!
The only hope for democracy in Egypt -- and it's a mighty slim one, maybe the size of a third of an M&M crushed under a camel -- is the military. At least they're not insane.
Nevertheless, the president of the United States is not amused. We read our government is secretly "reviewing" our support of Egypt. They are urging the Egyptian military to negotiate with the Brotherhood, the same religious fanatics who evidently just told 24 Egyptian policemen to lie face down in the Sinai desert and summarily executed them, the same madmen who are running all over Egypt burning down Christian churches.
What is the explanation for this absolutely self-destructive, even idiotic, policy on our part?
There can be only one -- the president of the United States is actually psychologically disturbed. He does not react in a normal manner. I know that's a vicious and importunate thing to say, but the reaction to Egypt (and to Benghazi, for that matter) is not one of a psychologically healthy human being.
It's more than the narcissism of which he is often accused, as bad as that is. It's a form of extreme neurotic attraction to (notably Islamic) religious fascism. Obama is not a Muslim, but he has these deep feelings about it (some of them related to imperialism, others to his absent father, no doubt) that allow him to overlook, or rationalize, all that hideous misogyny, homophobia, and jihadist fanaticism, that loathing of democracy and freedom, even when it could not be more obvious. To Obama, those abhorrent -- monumentally illiberal -- behaviors and ideologies almost seem irrelevant. But they are the most relevant of all.
The Egyptian military are at least modern. The Brotherhood are decidedly anti-modern, determined to take Egypt, and the world, back to the Middle Ages. (Obama was also, many of us remember, oddly unsympathetic to the cause of the Green Movement in Iran -- his silence setting him apart from virtually every Western leader.)
As I have written before (way back in 2010), Obama is a real weirdo.
But speaking of strange love affairs, our liberals continue to act as if Obama is normal, at least most of them do. You see actual Western (liberal) women speaking up in defense of the Muslim Brotherhood on cable television. Are they crazy? Have they lost their minds? Have they ever been to Cairo?
Well, I have -- and it's unspeakably poor and depressed. The Egyptians, as many have written, can barely feed themselves. If you cared even the slightest about the Egyptian people, you would unremittingly support the Egyptian military. They are the Egyptians' only hope for a decent life at this point.
But not if you're Barack Obama, lost in a childhood fantasy.
His supporters don't even have that excuse.
Anyway, as we all know...
This article was originally published at PJMedia.com. Refer to original article for related links and important documentation.
Los Angeles-based Roger L. Simon is the author of ten novels, including the prize-winning Moses Wine detective series, and seven screenplays, including "Enemies: A Love Story" for which he was nominated for an Academy Award. The 2012 Academy Award-nominated release "A Better Life" was based on his original story. He served as president of the West Coast branch of PEN and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Writers Guild of America. Mr. Simon was on the faculty of the American Film Institute and the Sundance Institute. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College and the Yale School of Drama. In February 2009, he published his first non-fiction book – "Turning Right at Hollywood and Vine: The Perils of Coming Out Conservative in Tinseltown". "The Party Line", a stage play Mr. Simon co-wrote with his wife Sheryl Longin was published by Criterion Books in November 2012. He is the co-founder and CEO of PJ Media.
The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...
The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.