Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






HHS Insurance Oversight Director Gary Cohen explained in congressional testimony that immigrants "could be here on a student visa and be eligible" for Obamacare.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
HHS: Immigrants on Student
Visas 'Eligible' for Obamacare

PJMedia.com
A Department of Health & Human Services official told the House Ways & Means Committee that immigrants living in the United States on temporary visas are eligible for federally subsidized health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, "depending on their income."

"It was my understanding it was just going to be those that are citizens of the United States or here as permanent legal residents," Rep. Jim Gerlach (R-PA), said at a Thursday hearing on the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. "Are there folks beyond that that are eligible for tax credit – taxpayer subsidies under this program?"

HHS Insurance Oversight Director Gary Cohen replied, "You have to be a citizen or lawfully present."

When Gerlach asked for further explanation, Cohen said immigrants "could be here on a student visa and be eligible."

Gerlach clarified Cohen's statement by saying, "So a student from Germany comes to the United States to do four years of college; that student is going to be subsidized by taxpayers for health insurance?"

"They are eligible for subsidies depending on their income, yes," Cohen replied.

He added that immigrants who "overstay" their visa would not be eligible for subsidies under the healthcare law.

Cohen also said the law's "data hub" would allow HHS to verify applicants' immigration status based on Homeland Security information.

Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY), asked Cohen if any "personal data" would be stored on the hub.

"No. The hub just routes information from the secure data sources -- IRS, Social Security, etc. -- so that it -- so that we can verify information that people put on their applications," Cohen said.

Rep. Diane Black (R-TN), has been an outspoken critic of the Obama administration's decision to delay income verification under the healthcare law.

Black told Cohen that three weeks ago HHS said they did not have the technology to verify the income of all applications.

"What's changed is that we've looked at our process and we have confirmed that we are able to verify income for 100 percent of the applicants who will be submitting applications to the marketplaces," Cohen said.

"I'm just really curious how in just three weeks -- with a rule being put out just three weeks ago to say we do not have the technology to be able to do that and yet three weeks later we're now seeing, oh, all of a sudden we have the technology to do that," Black asked.

"That's not right," Cohen responded. "We said we were going to sample and now we've concluded that the sample size is going to be 100 percent."

Crowley and many other Democrat members of the committee criticized the Republicans for their attempts to repeal the healthcare law.

"In terms of what would be helpful from Congress to aid with smooth implementation, are 40 repeal votes what you would consider being productive?" Crowley asked Cohen.

"I don't think they move the ball forward in terms of my job, no," he replied.

"Will tomorrow's 40th repeal vote to block tax credits from going to working families help with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act in any way?" Crowley also asked.

Cohen said no and Acting IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel told the committee the vote would not have "any impact."

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 08/07/2013

Editor's Note: Can you say international redistribution of wealth, from the American taxpayer to non-citizens??...








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server