Front Page           
Editorials              
Articles
World                  
USA                    
Terrorism            
Government        
Politics                
The Fifth Column
Education            
Culture Wars        
Media                  
Science/Tech   
Religion              
NMJ Radio          
NMJ TV               
Facebook            
Twitter           
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Site Information
Link to Us            
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Editorials
Frank Salvato, Managing Editor
The Tea Party Movement,
The GOP & Making It Work
Only the most partisan and/or politically ignorant among us would fail to recognize the magnitude, importance and the consequences of the Tea Party Movement. To be certain, it is a force to be reckoned with. But, as with the science of storms, there is a danger when two forces compete to occupy the same space. We of the Right side of the aisle must recognize this danger and insist that actions are taken, definitions are designated and roles are recognized, lest we turn an important moment in time into catastrophic history.

The first thing we have to do is to recognize and understand exactly what the Tea Party Movement is, where it came from and why.

Many in the political world have erroneously identified the Tea Party Movement as a political group not unlike the Democrats, Libertarians or Republicans. In fact, this couldn’t be further from the truth. Proof to this reality is in the fact that people who have embraced the Tea Party Movement come from every flavor of politics. When over a million people descended on Washington in the name of the Tea Party Movement last Fall, the crowd was comprised of people from every political party – sans the Progressives, every social background, every religion and every race. To say that it is dominated by any one political party is to make a huge mistake
...

Recent Articles:
The Time Is Ripe for Divide & Conquer
The Janus Face of the Progressive Democrats
At This Point It’s About Defining the “Win”
American Liberty v. Obama’s Social Engineering
Is the Constitution Just a Grand Suggestion?
Nancy Salvato, Senior Editor
To Faithfully Execute the
Presidency of the United States

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." -- Mark Twain

In his column, "Not the first president to break promises" found in The Baltimore Sun, Ron Smith writes:

"There's a video online lasting less than two minutes of a speech candidate Obama made, in which he promised the following things of his presidency: 1) making government open and transparent; 2) making it 'impossible' for congressmen to slip in pork barrel projects; 3) making meetings where laws are written open to the public; 4) promising 'no more secrecy'; 5) that the public would have five days to look at any bill before he signed it into law; and 6) saying 'We will put every pork barrel project online.'"

When studying history, it’s not so much a memorization of the details but noticing the emerging patterns that is most important. Any study of the 20th century American presidency would reveal that candidates actively seeking to become the Chief Executive of the United States make campaign promises to the people that cannot be addressed using the powers of the executive office. Once one detects such a pattern playing out in a presidential campaign, one can more realistically assess how successful a presidency might prove; in essence, it is possible to anticipate the next verse in the rhyme...

Recent Articles:
Can You Help Me Out with Some Change?’
For the Gen. Welfare or an Encroachment on Rights
The Turkey That Is Obamanomics
An Abridgement of Constitutional Rights
Utopia or Dystopian Nightmare?

This text will be replaced
right-click on the banner & "Save As" to download
Quote of the Day
"Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings." -- Heinrich Heine
This Week in US History
February 7, 1904: In Baltimore, Maryland, a small fire in the business district is wind-whipped into an uncontrollable conflagration that engulfs a large portion of the city by evening.

February 8, 1862: Union General Ambrose Burnside scores a major victory when he captures Roanoke Island in North Carolina. The victory was one of the first major Union victories of the war.

February 9, 1825: As no presidential candidate received a majority of electoral votes, the US House of Representatives votes to elect John Quincy Adams, who won fewer votes than Andrew Jackson in the popular election, as president.

February 10, 1965: Viet Cong guerrillas blow up the US barracks at Qui Nhon, 75 miles east of Pleiku on the central coast, with a 100-pound explosive charge under the building. A total of 23 US personnel were killed

February 11, 1861: President-elect Abraham Lincoln leaves home in Springfield, Illinois, as he embarks on his journey to Washington.

February 12, 1999: The five-week impeachment trial of Bill Clinton comes to an end, with the Senate voting to acquit the president on both articles of impeachment: perjury and obstruction of justice.

February 13, 1861: The earliest military action to be revered with a Medal of Honor award is performed by Colonel Bernard J.D. Irwin, an assistant army surgeon serving in the first major US-Apache conflict.
 

Every click on the green, double underlined text helps support NMJ and it costs you nothing!

Day by Day by Chris Muir


          Please Contribute Today!



Interview Schedule
Tuesdays
The Captain's America
NetTalkWorld Network
12:00pm ET M-Sa

Wednesdays
The Roth Show
USA Radio Network

5:00pm CT M-F

Saturdays
The Captain's America
NetTalkWorld Network
12:00pm ET M-Sa

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org